Package kept being returned in Shanghai

Asked by Eva Saini | 3/4/2021 6:58:16 AM

Hello,
Can you please let me know what's going on with my package number LZ673398307CN. It has been returned twice already and now the status shows again "Feb 28, 2021 10:07 Aliexpress-Cainiao: Departure from Regional Sorting Center, ShanghaiCity". Is this package coming to me?

You may get the answer from the following articles:

Why is my package stuck in transit for so long?

How do I track a package from China?

Why can't I track my China Post package?

1 Answer(s)

Daisy | 3/5/2021 7:27:20 PM Reply

Hi Eva Saini,

It didn't pass the check and was returned back for two times. It was delivered to you again now. You need to track it in the following days to see if it's normal. If it's returned back again or you couldn't receive it in time, you need to contact the seller to reflect the problem and give you a solution.

Related Questions

My package says "Shanghai, Shanghai Exchange Station returned" (2 replies)

This is my tracking for EB729466040CN
And it says:
2020-10-26 14:54
Shanghai, Shanghai Exchange Station returned.
I am concerned as to why it was returned? Thank you.

Package was returned from Shanghai and now stuck at Guangzhou (1 reply)

My package was returned from Shanghai international mail exchange on the 12th and has shown this message since 07/13:
Shanghai city , Departed 【Shanghai International mail exchange 】, Next stop 【Guangzhou International mail processing center 】（ Transit ）

The two tracking numbers are EB748674972CN and EB748599786CN. They are coming to Ontario, Canada.

Is my package LZ186012567CN being returned to sender (1 reply)

My package tracking says 'Shanghai, Shanghai Exchange Station returns.'

Is the package being returned to the seller? If yes, do you know why?

Where is my parcel to india no UR986754915CN (1 reply)

Shanghai (1 reply)

Was my package returned to the sender? (1 reply)

Shanghai, Shanghai Exchange Station returned (1 reply)

Returned to Shanghai and now stuck on 'arrival at sorting centre' (1 reply)