Can someone please explain me the status of my order

Asked by Yo | 12/7/2017 10:43:44 AM

Can someone please explain me the status of this shipment RY648156944CN. It will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Track Your Package

3 Answer(s)

Daisy 12/7/2017 9:09:47 PM

Hi Yo,

Your package couldn't pass the security check and is on the way back to the sender. You couldn't get it. Better contact the seller on Aliexpress as soon as possible to ask for re-delivery or get your refund.

2017-12-06 14:07 Guangzhou processing Center, has imported mutual seal (domestic transfer)
2017-12-06 14:04 Guangzhou, return, remark (couldn't pass security check)
2017-12-06 13:15 Guangzhou, has imported open and tear, note (return)
2017-12-02 11:32 Airlines shipped
2017-12-02 08:07 Guangzhou Processing Center, arrival
2017-12-01 09:05 Airlines shipped
2017-12-01 08:00 Guangzhou Processing Center, arrival
2017-11-30 07:06 Airlines shipped
2017-11-30 07:02 Guangzhou Processing Center, arrival
2017-11-29 12:40 Guangzhou processing Center, has been exported direct seal
2017-11-29 10:38 Guangzhou, opened for export
2017-11-26 10:37 Ningbo Processing Center, the export of mutual seal (domestic transfer)
2017-11-26 09:18 Ningbo, opened for export
2017-11-25 18:59 Zhejiang Ningbo Collection Center, has left, the next station processing center
2017-11-25 18:49 Ningbo, Zhejiang Collection Center, has been sent
2017-11-25 18:40 Ningbo, Zhejiang Collection Center, has received the mail
2017-11-24 10:36 The logistics order has been created

Yo 12/7/2017 9:26:49 PM

Hi Daisy,

Thanks. Do you know the reason why some packages couldn't pass security checking? My package contains just a jacket.. Thanks again.

Daisy 12/9/2017 8:36:06 PM

Hi Yo,

I'm not sure. You'd better let the sender call China Post service number 11183 in China and inquire the detail to let you know.

Related Questions

Answer This Question

The User Name field is required. The 'User Name' field must be a string with a maximum length of 30.
The Email field is required. The Email field is not correct in format!