☰
China Post: 86 10 11185 EMS: 86 10 11183
  1. Home
  2. Q & A

ePacket to Poland fees

|

What's the cost of shipping bfro. China to Poland. Fees ???

2 Answer(s)

user
Hi Krystian Czekaj,

By air: 139.4 rmb for the first 1kg and 56.1 rmb for each additioanl 1kg.
Via SAL: 117.8 rmb for the first 1kg and 44.5 rmb for each additioanl 1kg.

The price is just for your reference.
user
Can I make sure ePacket from China to Poland costs 140rmb for first kg and approximately 50 rmb for additional kg. How is it that ePacket to USA fee is 4 dollars USD???

Related Questions

ePacket to Poland fees (2 replies)

What's the cost of shipping bfro. China to Poland. Fees ???

How to Ship (1 reply)

How to Ship by ePacket/EUB Shipping
My Dad is in China Right Now i want to ask how ship by ePacket/EUB Shipping to Poland
He Lives in Foshan.
where i can Request Online to Pick Up my Pack from him ? by ePacket/EUB Shipping
how it will cost 6kg ?

RY444561172GB: Held at Customs due to unpaid fees (0 reply)

How do I pay the fees for this paecl

Custom Fees Payment EL368156035JP (0 reply)
How to pay custom fees (0 reply)
Importation fees to France (1 reply)
what is registration fee? (1 reply)
shipping from China to Israel (4 replies)

Answer This Question

Thank you！Your answer has been posted successfully!

China Post Tracking

Recommended Articles

Why is my package stuck in transit?

How to send parcels to foreign countries by china post

How long does it take to ship via China Post?

Why can't I track my china post package?

How do I track a package from China?

Wrong parcel address. How to change it?

China import and export regulations 2021

Hot Topics

EPACKET DELIVERY IN KSA (87 replies)
why is there no information on my package? (39 replies)
ePacket tracking # prefix "LZ" and "LO" (38 replies)
EMS not moving at all (34 replies)
Did my item leave China yet? "Shanghai, delivered to air transport" (31 replies)
ePacket to Philippines (27 replies)
ePacket not arrived. Please help (25 replies)
Difference between LL**CN and LM**CN tracking numbers (18 replies)